Posted by: Objective Scrutator | December 14, 2008

Homosexuals Are Equivalent To The Mumbai Islamofascists

Pat Boone, who has spent his life de-Islamifying and de-Homosexualizing such songs as “Ain’t That A Shame” by Black Panther Fats Domino, has the best grasp of this issue yet:

Pretty rotten thing that happened in Mumbai, huh?

[...]

Are you unaware of the raging demonstrations in our streets, in front of our churches and synagogues, even spilling into these places of worship, and many of these riots turning defamatory and violent? Have you not seen the angry distorted faces of the rioters, seen their derogatory and threatening placards and signs, heard their vows to overturn the democratically expressed views of voters, no matter what it costs, no matter what was expressed at the polls? Twice?

I refer to California’s Proposition 8. You haven’t heard about the well-oiled campaign to find out the names of every voter and business that contributed as much as $1,000, or even much less, in support of Prop 8? You haven’t heard about the announced plans to boycott, demonstrate, intimidate and threaten each one – because they dared to vote to retain marriage as between one man and one woman? You haven’t seen, on the evening news, prominent entertainers and even California Gov. Schwarzenegger, urging the demonstrators on, telling them they should “never give up” until they get their way?

Assuming you have become aware of all this, let me ask you: Have you not seen the awful similarity between what happened in Mumbai and what’s happening right now in our cities?

Oh, I know the homosexual “rights” demonstrations haven’t reached the same level of violence, but I’m referring to the anger, the vehemence, the total disregard for law and order and the supposed rights of their fellow citizens. I’m referring to the intolerance, the hate seething in the words, faces and actions of those who didn’t get their way in a democratic election, and who proclaim loudly that they will get their way, no matter what the electorate wants!

[...]

There never were any “rights” granted or designated to those who dissented with the will of the majority, other than the same rights all citizens have to work through the democratic process to accomplish their purposes. No “rights” were ever granted to citizens on the basis of their sexual habits or lifestyle. There simply are no such “rights.”

Slavery was abolished, blacks and women obtained the rights to vote, and these true rights were not obtained by threats and violent demonstrations and civil disruption (though these things did occur, of course), but by due process, congressional deliberations and appropriate ratification. This was democracy in action, not mob rule. As noted journalist Thomas Sowell has said, there never was “a right to win.” In America, at least the America we’ve known till now, rights are earned and won in a deliberative, legal way – at the polls.

What troubles me so deeply, and should trouble all thinking Americans, is that there is a real, unbroken line between the jihadist savagery in Mumbai and the hedonistic, irresponsible, blindly selfish goals and tactics of our homegrown sexual jihadists. Hate is hate, no matter where it erupts. And by its very nature, if it’s not held in check, it will escalate into acts vile, violent and destructive.

It is quite obvious, by now, that picketing someone’s business causes just as much turmoil among families as bombing a hotel does. As such, we should label both groups as anti-family, anti-business, and anti-American. Both homosexuals and Islamists should be executed under the law, unless we can receive valuable information from them by torturing them over and over again (as the television show 24 has shown over and over again). Liberals, of course, shrug their shoulders at these incidents, yet scream bloody murder when Christians and conservatives point out that these incidents are just small parts of their larger movements.

Thankfully, our program to eliminate the Islamists is, at the moment, intact, while we can address the homosexuals much easier. After all, I think that every country would rather fight a nation of homosexuals than they would a nation of jihadists. As such, I would propose a program from our government that would secretly eliminate these two groups from our society. I think that, ultimately, we will have to use the battlefield in order to eliminate these groups. Homosexuals can serve as a diversion from our troops, and we all know that homosexuals can put on a show anywhere. (As such, I would advise President Obama to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” much earlier than his proposed deadline, as long as he requires that homosexuals be kept separate from the rest of our troops, and also quarantined.) In the meantime, we can use Islamists as the people that are required to attempt negotiations with the enemy; right-thinking people will know that these negotiations will fail, while Leftists will be fooled.

While our public at large does not recognize the dangers homosexuals and Islamists pose our country, Pat Boone does. Pat Boone has unparalleled credentials for discussing these issues; homosexual Islamists such as Fats Domino and Nat King Cole had their lyrics tamed by the man that lives the quintessential American lifestyle. So if you are foolish enough to criticize Pat Boone, you are foolish enough to criticize America.


Responses

  1. Keep it believable, Scrutator, or else people will get the joke far too easily.

  2. What are you talking about, Ian? Christians realize that fags and Arabs are too dangerous to exist. OS is simply thinking about what to do with them. Do YOU have any better ideas, Peein Ian?

    I don’t see why George W. Bush or Dick Cheney can’t just kill them all. Now that Cheney’s daughter can no longer help this country, shouldn’t he kill her for the good of the land?

  3. You haven’t heard about the well-oiled campaign to find out the names of every voter and business that contributed as much as $1,000, or even much less, in support of Prop 8?

    You mean those must-be-disclosed-by-law names? Sort of how the Proposition 8 campaign started publicizing the names of businesses that donated to the No on 8 campaign? Stones, houses, all that.

    It is quite obvious, by now, that picketing someone’s business causes just as much turmoil among families as bombing a hotel does.

    That doesn’t even make sense.

    Homosexuals can serve as a diversion from our troops, and we all know that homosexuals can put on a show anywhere.

    This! Is! Sparta! (Look it up.)

    Nat King Cole was both a Muslim and gay? I guess that puts a whole new spin on his versions “White Christmas” and “Little Drummer Boy.”

    Ian, I agree: I think our dear host has jumped the shark.

  4. I luv Pat Boone. Heza best durn moozican Iv eva hurd! He much beta than lisnin two Negrows. Fags n sandies deeserve too dye.

  5. “Christians realize that fags and Arabs are too dangerous to exist. OS is simply thinking about what to do with them. Do YOU have any better ideas, Peein Ian?”

    Of course he doesn’t. He snuggles up with Sodomites and cuddles with Islamists.

    “You mean those must-be-disclosed-by-law names? Sort of how the Proposition 8 campaign started publicizing the names of businesses that donated to the No on 8 campaign? Stones, houses, all that.”

    That should be illegal. Businesses are now at the mercy of radical homosexuals.

    “That doesn’t even make sense.”

    It should, to intelligent Americans. If you picket someone’s business, you are reducing their profits, and therefore hurting their families. In the same way, the Mumbai Islamists are willing to kill innocent Americans, which hurts families.

    “This! Is! Sparta! (Look it up.)”

    300 doesn’t deserve to be degraded by the likes of you. We should use it as a manifesto on how to deal with Iran.

    “Nat King Cole was both a Muslim and gay? I guess that puts a whole new spin on his versions “White Christmas” and “Little Drummer Boy.””

    I guess it does, then. We need to ban his songs from America, entirely.

    “I think our dear host has jumped the shark.”

    It sounds like neither one of you can admit that homosexuals are dangerous people that need to be quarantined. As such, you label those that acknowledge the reality of the situation as pranksters.

  6. 300 doesn’t deserve to be degraded by the likes of you. We should use it as a manifesto on how to deal with Iran.

    I was referring, instead, to the Spartan encouragement of its soldiers taking lovers among the men in their barracks in order to foster unity in battle.

    Let us never forget that the most badass soldiers of antiquity loved to stick their peepees in other men’s behinds. Agape indeed!

    Boy, if you’re for real, I would love to interview you for a research paper.

  7. “Of course he doesn’t. He snuggles up with Sodomites and cuddles with Islamists.”

    Hahaha. Of course I do, Scrutator, of course I do.

    Hahahahahaha. Hee. I love this blog.

  8. “I was referring, instead, to the Spartan encouragement of its soldiers taking lovers among the men in their barracks in order to foster unity in battle.

    Let us never forget that the most badass soldiers of antiquity loved to stick their peepees in other men’s behinds. Agape indeed!”

    Nonsense. Athenian revisionists took a few Spartan problems and exaggerated the lengths and effects of those problems. Athens was trying to hide the fact that they were rabid pedophiles and wimpy fighters. They attempted to give intellectual cover to pedophilia and homosexuality; this intellectual cover is taken seriously by many Leftists today.

    “Boy, if you’re for real, I would love to interview you for a research paper.”

    That’s not a problem, as long as you can set up the time and communication method. I would also have to read your finished product, so that I could make sure that my views aren’t misrepresented.

    “Of course I do, Scrutator, of course I do.”

    He admits it!

  9. Athens was trying to hide the fact that they were rabid pedophiles and wimpy fighters.

    Now who’s being the historical revisionist?

  10. “Now who’s being the historical revisionist?”

    Everyone admits that Athenians engaged in pedophilia. What Leftists attempt to do is to label Sparta as a society with even more pedophilia, which is simply not true.

  11. “What Leftists attempt to do is to label Sparta as a society with even more pedophilia, which is simply not true.”
    Spartans were encouraged to partake in sexual relations with their fellow soldiers, in hopes that it would generate greater camaraderie. Though it was technically supposed to cease after a certain time period, this was never enforced.

  12. What Leftists attempt to do is to label Sparta as a society with even more pedophilia, which is simply not true.

    Hmm. I was discussing homosexuality, not pedophilia. I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that I know far, far more “Leftists” than you. This is not a particular area of concern in our discourse.


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories