Wow! I just found this movie when I was surfing the web. It’s amazing how easy it is to prove Darwin wrong _ even a bimbo woman can do it!

So, Darwinists, what do you have to say to this? The complexity of the human eye is unimaginable. God, in His omnipotence, even thought to give us cataracts and other miraculous problems, thanks to the Sin of Eve. In the same way that we can tell that bags are designed, we can see that the human body is designed. After all, the Second Law of Thermodynamics states that entropy must happen in all systems; in observance to the fact that Darwinism is anathema to entropy, we can safely conclude that God is real, and that Evolutionism is false.

At the same time, however, we must be careful NOT to apply this into thinking that this can prove Rapture Theology, or Dispensationalism. There is no Biblical evidence for a Rapture, and such a doctrine actively discourages political activism by Christians. While we must acknowledge that the Dispensationalist correctly views entropy as a good thing, the Dispensationalist somehow suggests that God will bring the world’s end, a good thing, suddenly. Thanks to the Sin of Eve, such action taken from the God of the Bible would be blasphemous. We will have to Christianize the rest of the Earth, by the Sword, before we can expect the LORD to cause entropy to reach its grand finale. This will probably have to be achieved by an offensive Star Wars program, where we nuke every offending country.

Ironically enough, the Big Bang itself is proof of the LORD, yet scientists refuse to acknowledge it, and come up with such nonsense as the Hawking / Penrose singularity theorems, or the ridiculous postulation that Quentin Smith goes into in his laughable article, Atheism, Theism, and Big Bang Cosmology. A blog entry is not worth the time to refute his horribly wrong theories; if we simply apply Occam’s Razor to it, then we can dismiss it out of hand. The Big Bang, as first described by the Bible, took Six Days. While Big Bang theoreticians such as Tryon and Gott claim that there are several alternate universes, emerging as vacuum ‘fluctuations’ from a background empty space, they fail to realize that this argument can be applied to the Holy Bible, in order to reconcile the two Creation stories. Therefore, in accordance with the Bible, we can assume that Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 took place in alternate universes. The LORD later warped and bended these two worlds into one.

This explanation of Creation makes far more sense than the Evolutionist’s attempt to flat out deny God. Thus, seeing as how the two Creation stories can be reconciled, Genesis is completely true. (For the further inquisitive, I would highly recommend a visit to the Creation Museum. They have already proven the rest of Genesis.) Creation reconciliation is the biggest nail in the coffin of the Theistic Evolutionist’s arguments, since one cannot reconcile Christ’s sacrifice with the absence of Adam and Eve. Now that the Creation stories have been reconciled, however, no atheist can say that the Bible is errant.

Finally, we should always remember that the invisible hand of the free market proves God. The atheists can only get their claptrap ideas of Darwinism and the Big Bang (to say nothing of Heliocentrism, global warming, plate tectonics, atom theory, and other such crocks) through the socialist university systems. In the hands on parts of America, however, people like Miss Hasselbeck know the Truth.

Of course, this proof was rather cumbersome and unnecessary. Occam’s Razor, as espoused by Miss Hasselbeck, proves that Darwinism is false. Still, for atheists and the rest of their ilk, one can only make a purpose using long winded proofs. It’s always amusing to beat the Atheist at their own game, while still realizing the truth of Occam’s Razor.