Every time I walk by my building’s lobby in order to get to the elevator, I am forced to observe our ridiculous left-wing media ridicule the concept of the Constitution, and openly try to grant Hugo Chavez access to America’s nuclear weapons. After all, Zelaya recently made the Communist assertion that he should be President for life; after the Honduran Supreme Court stated that their Constitution does not permit such excessive power, the President tried to change the Constitution anyways. Thankfully, the military and the rest of the government would not stand for that nonsense, and promptly booted him out. The magnanimous lengths that they are going in an attempt to keep this Chavez-sucking swine out of their country is truly admirable; certainly, it is more admirable than the lackluster efforts our Republican Party has taken in ousting our illegitimate, inexperienced President, who continues to hide his birth certificate from Americans. Their government has valiantly shut down airports in order to keep Zelaya out of their country, and exterminated several unionized Socialist thugs that attempted to secure an airport for their Dear Leader.

As conservatives, we should valiantly stand by Honduras in their attempt to erect laissez-faire capitalism in their country, as well as stand by their commitment towards democracy (excluding the Communists, of course). After all, was it not America which gave the world a concept of how a Constitution should be, one that keeps bureaucrats and politicians in their places? Unfortunately, the MSM has been unanimously on the side of evil; even the normally acceptable Fox News has declined to announce its unremitting support towards Honduras. So, for the few enlightened that support the disposal of Zelaya, I salute you!

However, the question eluded me: Why does the world hate Honduras’ new government, a stalwart of democracy? Dennis Prager’s
call to arms answered my question, and it should be an inspiration to Americans old and young, rich and poor, white and black, Creationist or Intelligent Design Theorist, hard-working or privileged:

The importance of the summit meeting in Moscow between President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev pales in comparison to the events taking place in Honduras.

Whether or not the United States and Russia reduce their nuclear arsenals is ultimately meaningless. But whether Hugo Chavez and Raul Castro are victorious in Honduras or whether the movement toward left-wing authoritarianism is finally defeated in a Latin American country is extremely significant.

Our illegitimate President supports another illegitimate President supported by several illegitimate rulers while in an illegitimate talk about axing legitimate means of defense. Typical moonbat.

The courage of the pro-liberty forces in Honduras is almost miraculous. It is almost too good to be true, given Honduras’ consequent isolation in the world.

Even if you know little or nothing about the crisis in Honduras, nearly all you need to know in order to ascertain which side is morally right is this: Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega, Cuba’s Castro brothers, the United Nations, and the Organization of American States are all lined up against Honduras.

And what troubles these good people? They claim that there was a military coup in Honduras that renders the present government illegal.

It is unfortunate that America must be included in this list: even the most arrogant liberal understands that American patriots are conservative, while everyone knows that the one who waves the Cuban, Venezuelan, Nicaraguan, or United Nations flag is the one that is an unreformed Marxist, a Bolshevist of the worst order, and an enemy of democracy and free markets. That the United States is not setting out to eradicate Cuba, to exterminate Venezuela, or to punish Nicaragua is scandalous. That the United States has not withdrawn from the United Nations over the UN’s support of a dictatorship ought to bring criminal charges against President Obama and his lapdog, Hillary Clinton, and the entire US Department of State. The OAS, of course, is just a joke that 99% of Americans have never heard of, and will soon never need to hear of it again,

Here, in brief, are the facts. You decide.

The president of Honduras, Jose Manuel Zelaya, a protege of Hugo Chavez, decided that he wanted to be able to be president for more than his one term that ends this coming January — perhaps for life. However, because the histories of Honduras and Latin America are replete with authoritarians and dictators, Honduras’s constitution absolutely forbids anyone from governing that country for more than one term.

So, Zelaya decided to follow Chavez’s example and find a way to change his country’s constitution. He decided to do this on his own through a referendum, without the congressional authorization demanded by Honduras’s constitution. He even had the ballots printed in Venezuela.

As Mary Anastasia O’Grady, who writes The Americas column in the Wall Street Journal, explains: “A constituent assembly can only be called through a national referendum approved by its Congress. But Mr. Zelaya declared the vote on his own and had Mr. Chavez ship him the necessary ballots from Venezuela.”

The sweetest thing about all of this is that Chavez was surely about to use Honduras as his forward base against the American economy; Honduras would be an awfully convenient location for Venezuelan bombers to refuel after whittling away at American oil excavations. His insidious plot has been thwarted… for now. Chavez, being a rash man, will probably attempt to take over Honduras himself, rather than wait on the United Nations and the rest of the crooks to secure it for his disciple. He will inevitably inflict collateral damage on the Communists supporting Zelaya, thus converting the Commies that remain into free marketeers. With the extra bolster from the new Honduran patriots, Chavez’ invasion will go down in flames, many countries will resign from the United Nations in protest, and the Republicans will pursue a policy that involves supporting Honduras while attacking Venezuela, which will win them the Senate and most of the House in 2010.

The Honduras Supreme Court ruled Zelaya’s nonbinding referendum unconstitutional, and then instructed the military not to implement the vote as it normally does. When the head of the armed forces obeyed the legal authority, the Honduran Supreme Court, rather than President Zelaya, the president fired him and personally led a mob to storm the military base where the Venezuela-made ballots were being safeguarded.

As Jorge Hernandez Alcerro, former Honduran ambassador to the United States, wrote, “Mr. Zelaya and small segments of the population tried to write a new constitution, change the democratic system and seek his re-election, which is prohibited by the constitution.”

In order to stop this attempt to subvert the Honduran constitution, while keeping Honduras under the rule of law and preventing a Chavez-like dictatorship from developing in its country, the Honduran Supreme Court ordered the military to arrest Zelaya. They did so and expelled him to neighboring Costa Rica to prevent certain violence.

Mr. Alcerro wrote a rather excellent letter to the Washington Post in response to a rather ignorant story they wrote about the Honduras Constitution. His own Leftist party was in control of Congress when they decided to remove the swine from office; that he has to come crying to OUR officials is despicable; similarly, our complacency in insisting his wicked plans is similarly despicable. Zelaya should be lucky that he was expelled to Costa Rica, a neutral country; if he had been expelled to Canada and managed under the stern leadership of Stephen Harper, then he would have been dealt with in a swift and appropriate manner.

Was this a “military coup” as we understand the term? Columnist Mona Charen answered this best: “There was an attempted coup in Honduras, but it was Zelaya who initiated it, not his opponents.”

Or, to put in another way: When did a military coup ever take place that was ordered by that country’s supreme court, that was supported by the political party of the president who was overthrown, in which not one person was injured, let alone killed, and which replaced the ousted the president with the president of the country’s congress, a member of the same party as the ousted president?

There’s quite a difference between attempting to become a tyrant and attempting to stop a tyrant. The Honduran military, Supreme Court, and Congress did the only reasonable thing one can do when their country is about to become the new Stalinist utopia: they deported their aspiring tyrant, and quelled the riots.

What I am concerned about is this: Will this coup eventually lose its energy, much like the 2002 coup to oust Hugo Chavez? Will the ruling party eventually abandon the free markets in favor of kowtowing to an organization as naive and totalitarian as the UN?

But none of this matters to the United Nations, which never met a left-wing tyrant it didn’t find appealing. That is why the president of the U.N. General Assembly, a former Sandinista foreign minister, Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann, accompanied Zelaya in the airplane on Zelaya’s first attempt to return to Honduras on July 5. (Brockmann, among his other radical moral positions, is so virulently anti-Israel that the Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations threatened not to attend the U.N. Holocaust Memorial Day event if Brockmann showed up.)

If only those two were assassinated in one fell swoop! The opportunity for ridding the world of two of its worst tyrants is glaring Obama in the face, and he is more than willing to watch the opportunity dissipate. The reason for that, of course, is because Obama is one of them.

And none of this matters to the OAS, which just lifted its ban on Cuba’s membership and which says nothing about Chavez’s shutting down of Venezuela’s opposition radio and television stations.

Of course, the Organization of American States is more than happy to deny Honduras its membership. Of course, the Osama Administration is more than happy to allow other countries to model themselves after our Fairness Doctrine, while more than unhappy to allow other countries to model themselves after our Constitution. In addition, the current secretary-general of the OAS, Miguel Insulza, assisted in the tyrannical reign of Salvador Allende, before finally being ousted by the just and freedom-bri

And none of this matters to the world’s left-wing media. Thus, on July 1, a writer for the United Kingdom newspaper The Guardian penned this insight: “There is no excuse for this coup. The battle between Zelaya and his opponents pits a reform president who is supported by labor unions and social organizations against a Mafia-like, drug-ridden, corrupt political elite.” To the Guardian writer, Zelaya was a “reform president.”
Lenin’s useful idiots never die out.

Then again, according to the Guardian, it’s better that one person comprises the political elite than dozens of people comprise the political elite. Sheer idiocy.

And the Los Angeles Times editorial page wrote: “Even though the Honduran Congress and military may believe they are defending the country against a would-be dictator, the ends don’t justify the means.”

Quite a great deal of foolishness in one sentence. That the Los Angeles Times does not believe that Zelaya is a would-be dictator is mind-numbing. As for the cliche that “the ends don’t justify the means,” in fact they quite often do. That is one of the ways in which we measure means. One assumes that while the Los Angeles Times believes that Americans should be law-abiding, it agrees with Rosa Parks having broken the law. The ends (fighting segregation) justified the means (breaking the law).

What Micheletti did is even more justified than what Rosa Parks did: while she inconvenienced several Americans in their daily lives and cost the economy several thousand dollars, Micheletti is only bringing convenience to those that accept it, and will drastically improve Honduras’ economy.

If Honduras is hung out to dry, if America suspends trade and economic aid, the forces arrayed against liberty in Latin America will have won a major victory. On the other hand, if Honduras is not abandoned now, those Iran-supporting, America-hating, liberty-loathing forces will have suffered a major defeat.

Even members of the Obama administration recognize this. As quoted in the Washington Post, Jeffrey Davidow, a retired U.S. ambassador who served as President Obama’s special adviser for the recent Summit of the Americas, said:

“The threats against democracy in Latin America are not those coming from military coups, but rather from governments which are ignoring checks and balances, overriding other elements of government.”

Let your representatives in Congress know that America needs to stand with liberty, not with Castro, Ortega, Zelaya, Chavez, the OAS, and the U.N. And buy Honduran goods. I am smoking a terrific Honduran cigar as I write these words: God bless Honduras.

Honduras was once an enemy of American interests; now, it is our ally. If Osama Obama makes a single mistake on handling this new government, however, all of our gains will have turned to losses, and we will eventually have to bomb Honduras like we must Iran. Of course, we know he will make that single mistake.

I apologize for my absence; I have been busy in other soul-winning projects this spring and summer, and have also had to find loopholes in Obama Osama’s stimulus plan for my business to survive.

I can recall the debate I had with Tom quite clearly over the morality of long-haired men, and have not really had the time to put in an argument without sounding vain and conceited. I apologize for my obvious failings in attempting to respond to Tom; I should have found the time to answer his arguments. While I still do and probably always will disagree with us, this discussion is theologically healthy; in addition, since we agree on most other doctrinal issues, this debate will likely be constructive. (The numerous atheists here have certainly made debate harder here; while I am obligated to allow them to run their traps, so that they will say ignominious tripe, it really does get tiresome when I have to delete numerous profanity-laden material.) Finally, this thread can serve as a sort of clean-up; I generally do not respond to comments on threads many months old, so this thread will prove useful in blogkeeping subjects.

For now, I shall present the argument of one other person, and add my own commentary to it:

The pain and suffering this poor man feels from seeing that hideous sign everyday is instinctual and Biblically based, backed up with sound Scripture. The issue of long hair on Jesus certainly isn’t adiaphora, so why should long hair on other men not be adiaphora?

Going Galt has never looked better, and now the Republicans are taking us up on our sensible offer:

New York Republican Rep. Peter King thinks his party needs to go nuke if Bush era officials are prosecuted on torture charges.

King, the outspoken ranking member of the House homeland security committee, said Republicans should “shut down [legislative] activity across the board” if any Bush-era officials are hauled into court.

“We would need to have a scorched-earth policy and use procedural means to bring the place to a halt — go to war,” he told POLITICO.

He added:

“If we have another 2,000 people killed, I want Nancy Pelosi and [liberal philanthropist] George Soros, John Conyers and Pat Leahy to go to the funeral and say, ‘Your son was vaporized because we didn’t want to dump some guy’s head under water for 30 seconds.’”

Pelosi, Leahy and Conyers haven’t called for prosecutions but have said more information needs to be gathered to determine if officials who authorized waterboarding violated the law.

When one starts to think about the political and moral repercussions of the laws the Arab Administration is passing, one cannot wonder too much about what will happen to themselves, especially if they are conservative. Will the Osama administration punish those who dare to spread Christianity to the spawns of welfare queens in our public schools, in the name of ‘public tolerance’? Will those that worship our LORD and Savior Jesus Christ be forced to be tortured by Osama’s vampire minions, which include Hillary Clinton, Timothy Geithner, Al Franken, Scott Murphy, and other deviants? Will Democrats suspend the free markets in the name of making our country less appealing for Somalian pirates to plunder?

Our Christianity and our very way of life is under assault by our new government. IHOP, through attempting to prosecute the man who got our laws right, is attempting to erode the American way of life right underneath our noses. So what can we, as Christians, do? Our only rallying hope at this point would be the variety of tea parties that occur in your immediate area. Our first tea party does not have to be our last, however, and we need to take every possible opportunity to teabag the liberals to death so our government can remain Christian and free.

Of course, these tea parties should be direct challenges to the reign of President Osama. As such, I would advise that each tea party persuade a deviant to be the target of their tea party. Each region will likely have a different candidate; San Franciscan patriots will want to recruit homosexuals, Texans will want to recruit illegal immigrants, Veterans will want to recruit necromancers, and residents of Huntsville, AL; Houston, TX; and Merritt Island, FL will all want to recruit the tax sucking Copernicans that propagate in those areas. Once kidnapped, the resident should be force fed month-old teabags until they repent of their Socialism and their Atheism. (Note: Please carry these ideas out under the watchful eye of your local Tea Party Chapter. Otherwise, you may mistake a Real American for a Commie, or be killed by a Commie while attempting to gather captives.)

While even some conservatives may mock these righteous proceedings I propose, I base these proceedings off of something greater than you: the Word of the LORD:

Deuteronomy 23:1
He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

While it is obviously morally wrong to cut these people off from a House of Worship, we can symbolically use Tea Parties to cut them off from the government, which is something we MUST do. The tea bags bursting in their mouths will make a mockery out of their representative groups, and hopefully make them look foolish to the American voter. Since the various interest groups comprising the Democrat Party will invariably be shortsighted and looking for any publicity possible, this should not be too hard.

If the Democrats want to cut us out of the legislative process, then maybe we should cut their base out of the voting process.

I apologize for my lack of activity here as of late. The reason I have had to be gone so often, of course, is because the LORD is punishing the entire nation due to their lack of faith in Him. Even those with faith are being punished for not actively working to enforce the prosperity and monopoly of the One True Faith in America. The LORD takes no pleasure in doling out His punishments, but dole them out He must. Much of His punishments are actions that He expects His people to administer themselves, rather than being lazy and letting the LORD do the work. For example, we should have destroyed the unions during the era of President Bush; for not standing up to the task, the LORD is forcing us to pay OUR hard-earned tax dollars to mediocre car companies for the sole sake of keeping them afloat. Now, they have the audacity to demand a higher minimum wage at the time where most Americans are out of jobs (whereas the minimum wage necessarily reduces the amount of people that can compete in the work force). In the meantime, agencies that have protected Americans through the good times and the bad, such as AIG, are now being persecuted and accused of wrongdoing that was never done. In a just world, AIG executives would play a greater role in promoting the Faith, they would be able to accept as big of a bonus as they could handle, and they would never have to tolerate some loser call into CNN just to scream at them.

The LORD justly punishes those who do not try their hardest to promote the Faith throughout America, just as He punishes those who deviate from worshiping His prized prodigy child, the free market. Even those who normally live pious lives are not living their lives piously enough, as the LORD is showing us.

As someone who has had his stock continuously devalued, I know that I am among the targets the LORD seeks to punish. As such, I must keep up the Faith in numerous other ways, much of which consist of evangelizing the Gospel towards primitive third-world countries. Expunging their culture has been what my family and I have been called to do, and in the name of Him I shall comply. Third world countries, such as Iceland, must have the LORD and His prodigy child forced upon them for their own good. If we do not comply with His mandates, then we will be justly punished.

As such, my efforts in evangelizing in other countries means that, for the time being, I will no longer be able to maintain this blog. Perhaps in the summer, I will be able to write more. At the time being, however, please deliver your undivided attention to Bob Evans. Bob Evans is an unsurpassed master at Internet evangelism, and I will hope that you give him more respect than you gave me. During this time of crisis, we should turn to Bob as a way to discover the best ways to raise our children in the name of the LORD.

May the LORD be with you.

I think that the following video is quite telling in how our nation has instructed its future bearers about attacking police officers and stealing cars:

The crime this girl committed was horrifying:

The girl was arrested after she was caught in her parents’ car, which had been reported stolen from her parents’ Tukwila home. Deputy Travis Brunner spotted the car driving without headlights about 3:45 a.m. on 32nd Avenue South in SeaTac and pulled it over.

She and another 15-yearold girl were arrested and taken to SeaTac City Hall to be fingerprinted before being transported to the youth detention center.

The results of what this brat did to the poor policeman are appaling:

In his own report from the incident, Schene wrote that the shoe hit him in the right shin, “causing injury and pain.” He wrote that he “placed” her into handcuffs and that she needed medical attention for a “panic attack.”

He said a “blood filled pocket” formed on his shin, requiring treatment at Auburn General Hospital, according to his report.

Thankfully, as the video shows, the policeman was able to subdue this little imp. Liberals and other anti-policeman nuts may complain about this incident, yet if parents would administer the same amounts of justice to the little brats as the officer had to do, then the police officer would not have had to subdue the imp so savagely. In this way, we can allow parents to retain full control of their children. As it stands, though, it is a shameful reflection on these liberal morons that the government has to come in and deliver the proper punishment. Apparently, corporal punishment has to be administered by the government, now. For the first time in my life, however, the liberals are stating that a particular kind of welfare is bad!

What’s even worse than having a policeman administer this kind of punishment to the child, however, is having the government criminalize anyone, including policemen, that dare to punish children that assault officers and steal cars. If the liberals have their way, then there will be no incentive for anyone to stop their children from stealing cars or beating up police officers. If someone finds, out of the goodness of their hearts, their own incentive, then they will be punished on pain of being forced to go through a liberal rehabilitation program.

The Bible warns against such a threat. In Deuteronomy 18, the LORD clearly states what to do with such children: 18 “If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who does not obey his father and mother and will not listen to them when they discipline him, 19 his father and mother shall take hold of him and bring him to the elders at the gate of his town. 20 They shall say to the elders, “This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious. He will not obey us. He is a profligate and a drunkard.” 21 Then all the men of his town shall stone him to death.” Such an action will terrify the children out of doing anything as wrongheaded as our 15-year old imp just did. I know for a fact that my children respected my authority once we had one of my nephews stoned for stealing a cheese wheel from my cellar. While his passing may have been unfortunate, the Holy Spirit has now taken full control of our children, and none of mine have done a single thing wrong since.

If we could just instill the same family values that the LORD mandates into other parents, then maybe our police will not have to be the ones to administer the punishment, and maybe our children will not be inspired to commit such horrific crimes. As it stands under President Osama, though, we will have to submit to a welfare system, and let the policemen take care of the brats and imps in our country. (Perhaps, when Iraq Hussein is forcibly removed from office via tea bagging, we can just have the NSA wiretap homes and make sure that parents are administering the appropriate corporal punishment. As it stands, however, IHO is a Fascist goosestepper, and would undoubtedly abuse his power.)

God bless this country, with liberty and justice for all.

Somebody needs to make Rick Santelli the Republican Party Presidential nominee in 2012:

Although our pansy liberal detractors frequently complain about the ‘evil Wall Street gang’, as Communist Chinese propaganda would say, even they (hopefully) have reservations about bailing out poor people that dared to attempt to live like kings. Thankfully, our populist movement of Chicago Mercantile Exchange traders recognizes the inherent danger in bailing out these stupid homeowners, even if the liberals don’t.

If we are to escape the recession, we will have to continue the War on Terror, which IHOP seems ill inclined to do. FDR, for starters, failed us miserably with the New Deal, but helped turn our economy around into a major industrial powerhouse when he increased war spending. If there’s one place that could always use new recruits, it’s the military, yet IHOP seeks to take this opportunity away from our men. In IHOP’s eyes, being a union slob protesting the reduction of 10 minute bathroom breaks to 7 minute bathroom breaks is much more productive to society than being a troop dedicated to extinguishing Islamofascism.

Elitists like Dennis Neal sit in their ivory tower studios and puff their faces up with perfume for the big sob story, while Americans like Rick Santelli are out there and experiencing the conditions firsthand. Who do you think Americans should trust?

(Incidentally, I should also add that Bobby Jindal’s speech, while unappreciated at this current moment, will soon become the golden standard for Americans to live by. Bobby Jindal, not IHOP, reflects the values of America.)

Real Americans and Christians salute this fine couple!

BOY dad Alfie Patten yesterday admitted he does not know how much nappies cost — but said: “I think it’s a lot.”

Baby-faced Alfie, who is 13 but looks more like eight, became a father four days ago when his girlfriend Chantelle Steadman gave birth to 7lb 3oz Maisie Roxanne.

He told how he and Chantelle, 15, decided against an abortion after discovering she was pregnant.

While these children may be on grounds for execution because of their selfish, sinful desires to fornicate, one has to admire their stance towards the sanctity of life. I am hardly the only one who expresses such viewpoints, however:

Last night Michaela Aston, of the anti-abortion Christian charity LIFE, said: “We commend these teenagers for their courage in bringing their child into the world.

“At the same time this is symptomatic of the over-sexualisation of our youngsters and shows the policy of value-free sex education just isn’t working.”

We should be thankful that these children did not attempt to use a condom while fornicating, and we should also be thankful that they knew of no such thing before fornicating. (Hopefully, they are still unaware that condoms exist, which is an excellent preemptive strategy to keep teenagers from fornicating.) When one wears a condom, the desire to fornicate increases quite rapidly; furthermore, the 99% failure rate of condoms is not something we should take lightly.

Finally, we should also be thankful that they fornicated not just for recreation, but for procreation. If they did not fornicate for procreation, God would quickly smite them as He did Onan. Such a fate would be sad, yet would also be justified. As it stands, we can exempt the children from the death penalty, although they will still have to be punished quite severely. Let us not worry about their punishment at the moment, however, and instead be thankful that they have a bundle of joy that will radiate her ecstatic beams all across the world.

AN ATHEIST IN THE WOODS
An atheist was walking through the woods.

‘What majestic trees!
‘What powerful rivers!
‘What beautiful animals!
He said to himself.

As he was walking alongside the river,he heard a rustling in the bushes behind him.

He turned to look. He saw a 7-foot grizzly bear charge towards him.

He ran as fast as he could up the path. He looked over his shoulder & saw that the bear was closing in on him..

He looked over his shoulder again, & the bear was even closer.

He tripped & fell on the ground.

He rolled over to pick himself up but saw that the bear was right on top of him, reaching for him with his left paw & raising his right paw to strike him.

At that instant the Atheist cried out,
‘Oh my God!’

Time Stopped.
The bear froze.
The forest was silent.

As a bright light shone upon the man, a voice came out of the sky.

‘You deny my existence for all these years, teach others I don’t exist and even credit creation to cosmic accident.’
‘Do you expect me to help you out of this predicament?

Am I to count you as a believer?

The atheist looked directly into the light, ‘It would be hypocritical of me to suddenly ask you to treat me as a Christian now, but perhaps you could make the BEAR a Christian’?

‘Very well,’ said the voice.

The light went out. The sounds of the forest resumed. And the bear dropped his right paw, brought both paws together, bowed his head & spoke:

‘Lord bless this food, which I am about to receive from thy bounty through Christ our Lord, Amen.’

Enjoy.